Tuesday, December 13, 2016

Don Hertzfeldt and Thorne Brandt


Hertzfeldt and brandt from Noel Johnson


Noel Johnson

New Media in Context

Joseph Delappe

13 December 2016

Absurdist Artists

            We will be comparing and contrasting animator Don Hertzfeldt and internet artist Thorne Brandt, choosing to focus on the motifs represented throughout their works. One work from each artist will then be analyzed in greater detail revealing these motifs and how they intermingle the two artists.

            Don Hertzfeldt is an animation artist well known for his cynical surrealism depicted through stick figure characters. His features have won two Academy Awards as well as the Sundance Film Festival’s Grand Jury prize for short films twice. Hertzfeldt’s style and technique, although still incredibly unique, draws from more analogue traditions. All Hertzfeldt’s animations are hand drawn and photographed using antique 35mm cameras. He creates his special affects through things like experimental photography, including things like over-exposures, and warped lighting. However, Hertzfeldt is not opposed to utilizing more digital formats to create his works. For example, his newest science fiction feature “World of Tomorrow” is a digitally rendered animation, while still utilizing his stick figure aesthetic.

            Thorne Brandt is an internet artist that specializes in utilizing web domains, social media, and gifs as a medium. He is, however, best known for his gif artworks, such as “Gif Connoisseur”, a Tumblr blog in which he acquires gifs from around the internet and photoshops his very own connoisseur character in front of them – and elderly man, dressed in fine attire, facing the gif, contemplating the gif as if it were a piece of art hanging within a traditional gallery space.

            Primary differences between these two artists lies within their utilized techniques. Don Hertzfeldt creates his story using more analog aesthetics – a stylistic choice that can still be detected by the audience even within his more digitally oriented works. Thorne Brandt, in contrast, has a very clearly “modern” and more internet- based aesthetic dominating his stylistic choices. These differences in technique and style also greatly effects the differences in how they portray their similar messages. Don Hertzfeldt, being an animator and storyteller, gives a more definite narrative to his pieces, whereas Thorne Brandt’s reliance more -so on the art of the internet, an already difficult to follow platform as is, leads to his artworks have a far less defined narrative that is much more open to audience interpretation.

The commonalities between these two artists, I find, stems much farther beyond their absurdist content and ability to push what is thought as “high” art as opposed to “low” art. Although they do have these things in common, they also possess a similar set of deeper meanings when you scrape away the upper layers of their artworks. Within the two pieces I chose to analyze from these artists there are common underlying motifs of uncertainty, subjective perception of time and realities, and ontological actuality (a philosophical idea focusing on the ideas of existence and humanity). Hertzfeldt shows these ideas through a science fiction situation while Brandt shows the presence of these ideas in our everyday existence.  

The piece I decided to analyze for Thorne Brandt is “A.G.O.D”. The acronym “A.G.O.D” stands for “Animated Gif Of the Day”. It is a short, 5-minute video in which Brandt, every day since its creation, layers a new gif into its composition. These gifs range from self-created to found gifs, some of which include sound that is layered in as well. This piece, on a surface level, captures Brandt’s overwhelming absurdity and maximalist style to represent the entropy of life within our fast moving, instant messaging, like and re-like, constant upload society. However, this piece does touch on the motifs that tie our two artists together as well. The aspect of uncertainty is present because, not only does the piece literally change from day to day, but also will change from viewing to viewing for the audience. This is due to the overwhelming nature of the piece, making it impossible for the audience to take in every detail of it. This represents the uncertainty of life and its everchanging, organic nature. Tied into this uncertainty in the concept of ontological actuality as well. The pieces ever changing, organic nature and aspects of uncertainty attribute to a contemplative mood encircling humanity and human existence – or more so, the lack thereof. The motif of subjective perception of time and reality is also introduced by the overwhelming tone of “A.G.O.D”. This is shown, very similarly to uncertainty, by the changing of experience every time it is viewed, showing that your reality of this piece is subjective to both what day you view it and what information your brain decides to pick out from the clusters of sound and imagery.

The piece I decided to analyze from Don Hertzfeldt was his most recent feature short film, “World of Tomorrow”. Within this narrative, a third-generation adult clone of the main character, Emily, communicates with a four-year-old “Emily Prime” (the original, non-clone version of Emily). Clone Emily then takes Emily Prime on a journey through time to show Emily Prime her (Clone Emily’s) memories. Throughout this journey, Emily Clone introduces a few things I would like to focus on. This includes the consciousness cubes and the clone David as an art installation. These two scenes in particular, best highlight the aforementioned motifs. The consciousness cubes, as described in the film, is a technology in the future that allows those who cannot be cloned to have their consciousness uploaded into a cube in which allows them to continue to “exist”. This idea ties heavily into subjective perception as well as ontological actuality. This idea that is questioning the importance of the body versus the importance of the consciousness ties into how we perceive and, on a deeper level, how we perceive our existence. It brings into question how we perceive the world, gather information, and learn without a body, and whether both body and mind are truly necessary to be considered existing. This same idea is heavily present within the art museum scene. Within this scene, it is described that a clone boy named David exists solely within a test tube in an art museum. He is alive biologically and grows, but without a brain. This makes him nothing but a body. This brings into question the same concepts of existence and perception. On the opposite end of the spectrum to the consciousness cubes, David “exists” only as a body without consciousness. Is one more validated than the other in terms of existence or are they both lacking true, total existence without their balancing counterparts? In terms of uncertainty, the entirety of the narrative plays with this idea. One of the things we consider most uncertain is the future. However, this rule is broken when Clone Emily travels through time to show Emily Prime moments from the future. However, this action itself is possibly discredited and poked fun at, as Emily Prime is at such a young age that she does not have the ability to be certain about any of the moments that she will likely forget. This then reintroduces the idea of uncertainty that was previously lost to us.







Bibliography

Brandt, Thorne. "The Gif Connoisseur." Blog post. The Gif Connoisseur. N.p., n.d. Web. 12

            Dec. 2016. <http://thegifconnoisseur.tumblr.com/>. 

Brandt, Thorne. "Pizza Dog." Pizza Dog. N.p., n.d. Web. 14 Dec. 2016. <http://pizzadog.org/>. 

Brandt, Thorne. "Thorne Brandt." The Fountainhead. N.p., n.d. Web. 14 Dec. 2016.

            <http://www.fountainheadresidency.com/thorne-brandt/>. 

"Don Hertzfeldt." Wikipedia. Wikimedia Foundation, n.d. Web. 14 Dec. 2016.

            <https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Don_Hertzfeldt>. 

Sims, David. "World of Tomorrow and the Copy-Pasted Brain." The Atlantic. Atlantic Media

            Company, 21 Jan. 2016. Web. 14 Dec. 2016.

            <http://www.theatlantic.com/entertainment/archive/2016/01/world-of-tomorrow-and-the-

            copy-pasted-brain/425016/>. 

Bramesco, Charles. "Animator Don Hertzfeldt on Not Trusting Happy People." The Dissolve.

            Pitchfork Media Inc., n.d. Web. 14 Dec. 2016.

            <https://thedissolve.com/features/interview/980-animator-don-hertzfeldt-on-not-trusting-

            happy-peop/>. 

No comments:

Post a Comment